Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081203
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '17 at 07:25
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 40.7 2-Core 81.3 42% 64.1 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 157 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	7.36% Terrible	Lighting 9.3 Reflection 9.12 Parallax 7.22 8% 8.54 fps	MRender 9.62 Gravity 6.47 Splatting 9.13 7% 8.41 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.36% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 470 Series SSD 128GB 915 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 99GB free Firmware: AXM08B1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 32732 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2257 (B1) Unknown 93 93 328 (B2) Unknown 78 78 442 (BE) vendor-specific 68 46 32 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2	42% Average	Read 208 Write 215 Mixed 201 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 10.2 64% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 17 DQ Write 66.9 DQ Mixed 10.5 17% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 53%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT07B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 21195 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1628 (B1) Unknown 91 91 98 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 55 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 30324685404	46.9% Average	Read 202 Write 216 Mixed 162 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 52.7 4K Mixed 12.6 81% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 27.8 DQ Write 71 DQ Mixed 12.5 20% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 85%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010) 6,983 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8758 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13742 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29917 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2162 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 27 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 13714 (C2) HDA temperature 115 98 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 196 183	65.4% Good	Read 132 Write 95.9 Mixed 86.3 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.26 84% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 85%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010) 6,983 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 739GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8400 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12875 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27112 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1970 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 33 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 12841 (C2) HDA temperature 114 99 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.5% Above average	Read 105 Write 98.7 Mixed 61.1 65% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.36 108% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 85%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 39GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 89 89 4200 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 11696 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 17696 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4052 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 54 353501205 (C2) HDA temperature 73 52 454164507 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 82492 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	40.8% Average	Read 70.2 Write 71.4 Mixed 22.7 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.35 103% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 62%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 1,355 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 949GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 81.6 Write 87.8 Mixed 15.4 73% 61.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.18 62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.2% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 6.9 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	79x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	32x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	28x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	10x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	10x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	198x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	60x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16