User System

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	White White Brand Product
Motherboard	White MS-1785
Memory	16 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160711
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '17 at 05:24
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HK 20,362 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 81.8 2-Core 158 62% 106 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 355 40% 315 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% MSI(1462 11AF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.5% Average	Lighting 58.4 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 54.8 48% 59.7 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 56.8 Splatting 62.8 50% 61.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49 58,154 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 236 Write 179 Mixed 352 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 96.8 4K Mixed 38.6 140% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 99.9 122% 215 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 157%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 602GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 121 121 98784247810 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2026 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3790 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1252 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 83 83 172398 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 219043594276 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	69.2% Good	Read 123 Write 118 Mixed 113 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.15 63% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905624-008.A00G 3x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12.2 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)