IBM System x3650 -[644723U]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemIBM System x3650 -[644723U]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM System Planar
Memory22.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '17 at 23:32
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 34
2-Core 86.3
38% 60.4 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 344
30% 256 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.9% Above average
Read 427
Write 412
Mixed 416
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 9.05
49% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 19.6
DQ Write 38.9
DQ Mixed 17.6
17% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 63%
Adaptec Array 600GB
546GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 476
Write 440
Mixed 456
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 13.6
43% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 31
DQ Mixed 16.7
16% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x2GB
12 of 12 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback