Asus X550JK

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus X550JK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X550JK
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141008
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '17 at 09:20
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ 69,536 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 188 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 498 49% 401 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 178D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.92% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 6.28 3% 8.17 fps	MRender 8.76 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 7.87 5% 6.34 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.92% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 180 120GB-$100 358 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1530 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 399 (AB) Unknown 100 100 41366608 (AE) Unknown 100 100 31 (BE) vendor-specific 100 100 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 98 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3042 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5174 (F9) Unknown 100 100 187255616	87.9% Excellent	Read 504 Write 379 Mixed 420 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 81.4 4K Mixed 20.5 108% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 55.7 107% 210 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 101%
Mass Storage Device 1TB 3,987 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 735GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 40.7 Write 40.6 Mixed 30.2 47% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.18 58% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 0420 F3-1600C11-4GSL 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 15.4 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 16.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X550JK Builds (Compare 563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JK

CPU
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	281x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	281x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	386x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples	177x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	40x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,847 samples	38x
EDJ4208EFBG-GNL-F Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 268 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $52

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16