Lenovo 23445PU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 23445PU (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 23445PU
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120525
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '17 at 02:52
Run Duration	1378 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	93%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3520M 19,660 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Memory 19.7 1-Core 43.6 2-Core 66.4 24% 43.2 Pts	4-Core 73.1 8-Core 93.9 11% 83.5 Pts	64-Core 63.2 4% 63.2 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 63%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 12TB free Firmware: 0001 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	9.3% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 7.24 Mixed 9.47 10% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.41 93% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 9.3% Great: 105%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 244GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH2ZB390 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 232 232 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2273 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 7747 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2268 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 385810454 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 68 68 324056 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 249108561961 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	50.1% Above average	Read 101 Write 73.1 Mixed 74.8 62% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.13 58% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 72%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.77% Terrible	Read 12.8 Write 11.9 Mixed 11.1 15% 12 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.15 42% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 7.77% Great: 61%
ST330006 51NS 3TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1.5TB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 23.9 Write 20.4 Mixed 7.91 20% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.54 86% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 45%
WDC WD20 03FYYS-02W0B1 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1.5TB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.5% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 20.3 Mixed 18.2 26% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.43 96% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 58%
ST330006 51NS 3TB 1.5TB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.9% Very poor	Read 22.9 Write 19.7 Mixed 10.8 21% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.53 100% 1.17 MB/s

WDC WD20 03FYYS-02W0B1 2TB 1.5TB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.6% Very poor	Read 21.8 Write 19.7 Mixed 12.8 22% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 2.62 4K Mixed 0.43 106% 1.23 MB/s

SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 908GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 22.1 Write 20.1 Mixed 21.5 27% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.44 86% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 46%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 863GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 23.9 Write 20.9 Mixed 21.1 28% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 37%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 794GB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 24 Write 21 Mixed 21.2 28% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.53 85% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 37%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 387GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.5% Very poor	Read 22 Write 18.2 Mixed 9.53 20% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.35 83% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 28%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA050 500GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 326GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 20.6 Mixed 10.6 22% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.2 67% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 69%
WDC WD20 EARS-60MVWB0 2TB 205GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.71% Terrible	Read 15.6 Write 12.9 Mixed 9.38 15% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.18 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.09 32% 0.37 MB/s

ST320005 42AS 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 204GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 25.2 Write 18.8 Mixed 17.1 25% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.4 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 41%
WDC WD20 EARS-60MVWB0 2TB 150GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.88% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 18.4 Mixed 20.1 25% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.13 37% 0.43 MB/s

WDC WD20 EARS-60MVWB0 2TB 134GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.24% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 14.2 Mixed 2.54 12% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.19 39% 0.48 MB/s

WDC WD20 EARS-60MVWB0 2TB 73GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.88% Terrible	Read 10.7 Write 5.11 Mixed 2.7 6% 6.18 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.05 38% 0.43 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5428-049.A00LF 8GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	27.5% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 9.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.3 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 323 12% 323 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 23445PU Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 23445PU

CPU
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	4x
NVS 5400MNvidiaBench 4%, 1,652 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
850 EVO mSATA 500GBSamsungBench 100%, 3,936 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston 9905428-095.D00LF 12GBSamsungBench 40%, 19 samples	1x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	1x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16