Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '17 at 16:04
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Memory 94.5 1-Core 141 2-Core 284 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 777 83% 664 Pts	64-Core 783 48% 783 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 36FC) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 114 Parallax 104 85% 107 fps	MRender 98 Gravity 97 Splatting 101 81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSD Smartbuy 60GB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM08.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12136 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3262 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 99 99 282 (AD) Unknown 100 100 59311006 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 626 (DA) Unknown 100 100 10 (E7) Temperature 100 100 69 (F1) Unknown 100 100 63040
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58 5,099 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 161GB free Firmware: SN04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 63 218069053 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5671 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 91 60 1539106039 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10316 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2326 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 589430819 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 754 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 5944 (C2) HDA temperature 35 48 68719476771 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 23 3 218069053 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	55.3% Above average	Read 98.3 Write 93.8 Mixed 97.6 73% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.38 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.55 154% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 104%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB 14,066 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 55GB free Firmware: JEDOA50A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 84 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 236 100 42949672961 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3265 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2490672 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 6692 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2954 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 571269578752 (BC) Unknown 100 99 917754 (BE) vendor-specific 72 43 471597084 (BF) G-sense error rate 90 90 2748 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 14876899 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 202585 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 38 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	28% Poor	Read 47.4 Write 49.9 Mixed 47.1 36% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.19 62% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	83.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 25.7 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 58.4 68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME - $185

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	370x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	78x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	100x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	46x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	42x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	25x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x
CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 24GBCorsairBench 65%, 14 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,445

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16