Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 0 old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '17 at 00:30
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-950-$191
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44% Average
SC Int 74.1
SC Float 74.4
SC Mixed 76.4
60% 75 Pts
QC Int 231
QC Float 206
QC Mixed 196
48% 211 Pts
MC Int 255
MC Float 288
MC Mixed 269
40% 271 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1559) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 29.3
9% 31.8 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 33.4
17% 33.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11%
Great: 12%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$95
99GB free
Firmware: CC3E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 107
Write 78.8
Mixed 25.2
51% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
87% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 66%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$75
69GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 42.9
Write 47.4
Mixed 20.1
27% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.06
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.06
11% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 35%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$19
25GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 74.7
Write 31.8
Mixed 51.3
40% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.31
83% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,875 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $268AMD RX 480 $220Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $235Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $137SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback