Medion Erazer P6661 MD99626

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer P6661 MD99626 (all builds)
Motherboard	Medion D15SHN
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160523
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '17 at 00:25
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 168 65% 112 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 251 34% 250 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1B0A 2281) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	5.19% Terrible	Lighting 5.87 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 5.44 5% 9.04 fps	MRender 3.71 Gravity 5.13 Splatting 11.3 6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.19% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD PHISON 128GB PS3109-S9 534 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 38 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1666 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 846 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 25 (AD) Unknown 100 100 138936398 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 41 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3614377	39.2% Below average	Read 366 Write 73.3 Mixed 102 39% 180 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 3.03 59% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 59.8 DQ Mixed 0.71 23% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 64%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 415GB free Firmware: AX1P1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1680 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 349 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 382 (0A) Spinup retry count 106 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 247 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 3 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5196 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 188979347481 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 67 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 269 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	53.5% Above average	Read 95.7 Write 90.8 Mixed 93.2 70% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.17 66% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB 77,702 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	28.3% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.5 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 9 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 88 46% 88 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16