Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 2,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 48.2 1-Core 21.4 2-Core 38.2 25% 35.9 Pts	4-Core 53.1 8-Core 61.3 8% 57.2 Pts	64-Core 58.3 4% 58.3 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (PHDGD Skylake v2.9) 11 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 3.0.64.2016 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.27 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 1.83 Splatting 3.39 2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba 064G70 63GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.0 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 151 Write 82.3 Mixed 107 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 8.05 44% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 28.8 DQ Mixed 8.14 12% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 28%
Microsoft 仮想ディスク 193GB 162GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.8% Very poor	Read 42.4 Write 14.7 Mixed 27.5 21% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.78 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.75 255% 1.78 MB/s

Generic SL200 SD Card 197GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 145GB free Firmware: 8.0 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 42.4 Write 16 Mixed 19.1 19% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.73 4K Mixed 0.38 268% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x2GB 7,517 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16