To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20080226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 22:39
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 6300-$7
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
SC Int 41.3
SC Float 19.1
SC Mixed 25.2
23% 28.5 Pts
QC Int 84.9
QC Float 40.9
QC Mixed 50.2
13% 58.7 Pts
MC Int 84.3
MC Float 40.2
MC Mixed 54.7
9% 59.7 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 14%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7900 GS
Asus(1043 8223) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.18.13.286
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.1
1% 3.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$16
203GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 71.5
Write 68.4
Mixed 63.4
51% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.16
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.37
60% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 0
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 16%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 2,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $90
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $297Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $724SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $152SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $56HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback