User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 20%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardMSI MS-7267
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 22:12
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$25
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
SC Int 52.9
SC Float 25.1
SC Mixed 34.4
30% 37.5 Pts
QC Int 104
QC Float 49.8
QC Mixed 69.2
17% 74.5 Pts
MC Int 107
MC Float 49.1
MC Mixed 68.4
12% 75 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 20%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8426) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 14
Parallax 11.4
4% 13.3 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 8.1
5% 10.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD800BD-22MRA1 80GB
47GB free
Firmware: 10.01E04 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 51.8
Write 50
Mixed 48.7
38% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 32%
197GB free, PID 0408
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 26.1
Mixed 19.5
31% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.18
55% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 27%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $160Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $125
Intel Core i5-8600K $222AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $911SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback