Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161107
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 21:42
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 67.5 2-Core 132 61% 96.9 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 396 40% 326 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120 20,573 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Gigabyte(1458 22C8) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1437 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Lighting 54.1 Reflection 53.9 Parallax 63.1 44% 57 fps	MRender 51.2 Gravity 48.8 Splatting 39 37% 46.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB 3,562 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0422C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 701 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 308 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 36 (B1) Unknown 100 100 8 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 35 0 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 268439625 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2221 (EB) Unknown 100 100 2570 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2632054 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2274828	75.7% Very good	Read 501 Write 376 Mixed 421 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 24.9 88% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 62 64% 103 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 135GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 99 27259392 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4858 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 107636593 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 15961 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2160 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 92 92 8 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 90 90 10 (BE) vendor-specific 71 45 488112157 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 324 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 36 36 129041 (C2) HDA temperature 29 55 38654705693 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 17 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -66082366807412 (F1) Unknown 100 253 139271477270058 (F2) Unknown 100 253 31508707608154	69.1% Good	Read 129 Write 112 Mixed 105 87% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.13 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.29 103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.1% Average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 17.5 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 13.1 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	431x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	85x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16