Asus P8H61-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.8% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130918
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 20:17
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
Intel Core i5-3570 17,755 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	SC Int 98.8 SC Float 102 SC Mixed 103 81% 101 Pts	QC Int 381 QC Float 388 QC Mixed 356 85% 375 Pts	MC Int 371 MC Float 394 MC Mixed 385 57% 383 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 14,898 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Sapphire(174B E244) 1GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.6.2 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Lighting 54.3 Reflection 43.7 Parallax 72.6 19% 56.9 fps	MRender 28.5 Gravity 48.5 Splatting 43.1 17% 40 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 10,967 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 16GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 20960 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2462 (B1) Unknown 64 64 1285 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 48 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 160 (F1) Unknown 99 99 97868341882	46.4% Average	Read 344 Write 159 Mixed 179 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 12.6 59% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 47.7 DQ Mixed 36.2 48% 91.6 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 72%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$63 8,474 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 688GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 120 120 25790513467 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 18 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 122 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 14 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 18 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 18 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 176095297572 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	82.8% Excellent	Read 147 Write 142 Mixed 18.5 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.2 75% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$44 494,745 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 100GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2266 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1166 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7549 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 871 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 43 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1125 (C2) HDA temperature 110 103 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	70.4% Very good	Read 128 Write 117 Mixed 119 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.3 120% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB 875 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 17 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M PRO Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PRO

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $91Bench 61%, 32,279 samples	49x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 71%, 54,067 samples	33x
Core i5-2500Intel $164Bench 65%, 19,181 samples	32x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 34,962 samples	41x
GTX 970Nvidia $370Bench 64%, 265,166 samples	23x
GTX 550 TiNvidia $250Bench 12%, 18,334 samples	17x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $65Bench 48%, 119,806 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $80Bench 94%, 274,376 samples	16x
830 128GBSamsung $109Bench 59%, 10,967 samples	11x

RAM
99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 282 samples	10x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 45%, 2,199 samples	8x
99U5471-020.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 277 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $156

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330	Nvidia GTX 1070 $447	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170	Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $290	AMD RX 480 $350	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12