Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.4% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-D (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 17:49
Run Duration	89 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
Intel Core i5-7400-$177 35,231 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	77.2% Very good	SC Int 101 SC Float 108 SC Mixed 105 84% 105 Pts	QC Int 390 QC Float 422 QC Mixed 403 92% 405 Pts	MC Int 393 MC Float 426 MC Mixed 406 61% 409 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$129 44,649 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 372E) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Lighting 103 Reflection 65 Parallax 82.4 30% 83.3 fps	MRender 77.3 Gravity 100 Splatting 75.9 36% 84.6 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 37%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$55 133,517 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 78GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 24736805 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -63771674410781 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 108 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 17 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 35 94491574303 (C2) HDA temperature 31 35 94491574303 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 24736805 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 24736805 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 24736805 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 598 (EA) Unknown 0 0 467 (F1) Unknown 0 0 467 (F2) Unknown 0 0 691 (F4) Unknown 100 100 851971	54.7% Above average	Read 409 Write 116 Mixed 174 51% 233 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 14 98% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 12.3 24% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$95 18,026 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	74.2% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 22.3 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 23.2 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

CPU
Core i3-6100Intel $108Bench 62%, 33,767 samples	337x
Core i5-6400Intel $174Bench 69%, 42,428 samples	267x
Core i5-7400Intel $177Bench 73%, 35,231 samples	229x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 39%, 150,599 samples	275x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 8%, 62,006 samples	228x
GTX 1050Nvidia $129Bench 34%, 44,649 samples	144x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $43Bench 53%, 27,100 samples	82x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $63Bench 59%, 29,833 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $104Bench 94%, 310,365 samples	49x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 38%, 10,634 samples	158x
Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 38%, 2,363 samples	71x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 9,445 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $306

CPU	GPU	SSD
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175	Nvidia GTX 1070 $447	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i7-8700K $320	Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i5-8600K $239	AMD RX 480 $280	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $116

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $911	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $58	HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12