Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.8% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 17:22
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
AMD FX-8320-$106 44,916 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	49.1% Average	SC Int 71.6 SC Float 61.1 SC Mixed 65.8 53% 66.2 Pts	QC Int 255 QC Float 216 QC Mixed 240 54% 237 Pts	MC Int 430 MC Float 368 MC Mixed 423 61% 407 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 58,743 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Palit(1569 1187) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.54 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Lighting 89.8 Reflection 69.9 Parallax 108 30% 89.4 fps	MRender 77.9 Gravity 106 Splatting 68.6 37% 84.3 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$165 49,014 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 97GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 592 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 443 (B1) Unknown 98 98 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 57 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 37 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3531152143	58.6% Above average	Read 360 Write 249 Mixed 192 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 16.7 91% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 36 DQ Write 65.1 DQ Mixed 17.2 22% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 93%
Kingdian S200 60GB 309 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 15GB free Firmware: P0921B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 54 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 195 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 146 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 17 (A4) Unknown 100 100 29981 (A5) Unknown 100 100 36 (A6) Unknown 100 100 7 (A7) Unknown 100 100 28 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 95 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 39518 (F2) Unknown 100 100 30603 (F5) Unknown 100 100 50284	46.5% Average	Read 355 Write 175 Mixed 110 46% 213 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 2.39 70% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24.8 DQ Write 98.6 DQ Mixed 4.31 20% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$41 134,605 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 861GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 73 (03) Spinup time 130 130 12896501936 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 707 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 626 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 447 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 707 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 707 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 184684707873 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	94.6% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 167 Mixed 88.6 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.17 83% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30 23,570 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 259GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 215801632 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6281 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 8886763985 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 32561 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3539 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 77 150326150417 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 37 28364553256994 (C2) HDA temperature 34 63 55834574882 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 41 18 215801632 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 123 1514 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 76201309808204 (F1) Unknown 100 253 300470593 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3021124483	62% Good	Read 104 Write 112 Mixed 30.7 60% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.55 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-DI CT51264BA160BJ.C8 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 11 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 2,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $98

CPU
FX-8350AMD $109Bench 56%, 106,563 samples	758x
FX-6300AMD $78Bench 48%, 83,748 samples	542x
FX-8320AMD $106Bench 51%, 44,916 samples	344x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $370Bench 64%, 265,166 samples	188x
GTX 960Nvidia $200Bench 40%, 133,666 samples	146x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 71%, 236,054 samples	133x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $80Bench 94%, 270,334 samples	198x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $65Bench 46%, 114,830 samples	130x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $137Bench 96%, 197,216 samples	83x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 25,300 samples	109x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 57%, 29,976 samples	81x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 49%, 25,637 samples	77x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $657

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330	Nvidia GTX 1070 $447	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170	Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $290	AMD RX 480 $350	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12