bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DH67BL
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 16:04
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 187 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 296 39% 292 Pts	64-Core 307 19% 307 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Lighting 48.3 Reflection 33.3 Parallax 39.9 39% 40.5 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 44.5 Splatting 39.1 33% 40.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19295 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 721 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 82 (AE) Unknown 100 100 202 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 51 210454380573 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 19982087157 (F7) Unknown 100 100 638183056 (F8) Unknown 100 100 2140335082	49.2% Average	Read 268 Write 255 Mixed 262 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 16.5 71% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 16 DQ Write 53.1 DQ Mixed 16.3 18% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 107%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 301GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 122 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 73 60 8273 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6203 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 43612 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3013 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 9 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 40 257698627612 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 238 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 3470 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 6366	63.1% Good	Read 83.4 Write 136 Mixed 118 85% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 3.12 4K Mixed 0.47 131% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 75%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 500GB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 159GB free, PID 7410 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 25.7 Mixed 17.7 30% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.31 57% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GLK64V6H 2x8GB 1,052 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.2% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.8 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,022x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,566x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16