MSI 970A-G46 (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970A-G46 (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 15:19
Run Duration391 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 121
56% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 398
37% 307 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 112
Parallax 106
86% 108 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 97.5
Splatting 99.2
80% 97.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB
49GB free
Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 437
Write 71.8
Mixed 130
46% 213 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 10.3
73% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 51.3
DQ Mixed 28.6
24% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 70%
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
29GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 489
Write 179
Mixed 163
60% 277 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 7.18
51% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 28.5
35% 62.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 83%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 487
Write 387
Mixed 402
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 34.6
130% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 97.9
DQ Mixed 25.2
43% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
811GB free
Firmware: 0707
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 29.7
Mixed 27.7
22% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.45
111% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
150GB free
Firmware: JC66 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 92.4
Mixed 73.1
63% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.41
95% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 68%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 6.44
Mixed 6.86
10% 9.52 MB/s
4K Read 1.51
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.006
6% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G46 (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI 970A-G46 (MS-7693) - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $376
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback