Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.51% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 15:13
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7700-$271
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
77.1% Very good
SC Int 115
SC Float 118
SC Mixed 116
93% 116 Pts
QC Int 366
QC Float 406
QC Mixed 363
86% 378 Pts
MC Int 527
MC Float 610
MC Mixed 591
86% 576 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4542
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
8.51% Terrible
Lighting 22
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 22.7
7% 24.3 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 33.9
10% 24.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 10%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB
79GB free
Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 477
Write 211
Mixed 207
65% 298 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 0.02
60% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 3.41
42% 99 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$47
611GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 98.3
Write 137
Mixed 135
93% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.26
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.24
119% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$47
274GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 142
Write 135
Mixed 136
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.25
103% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$56
68GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 95.5
Mixed 88
72% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.2
79% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$64
18GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 81.1
Write 79.8
Mixed 73.9
59% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.22
83% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
443GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 95.8
Write 84.8
Mixed 63
100% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.18
60% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 91%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $519
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $724SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $56HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback