User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardPOSITIVO G800
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 14:06
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3-3217U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
21.5% Poor
SC Int 48.8
SC Float 49.2
SC Mixed 49
39% 49 Pts
QC Int 123
QC Float 112
QC Mixed 76.1
24% 104 Pts
MC Int 113
MC Float 120
MC Mixed 122
18% 119 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(1297 2033) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 8.3
3% 10.6 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 16.1
4% 10.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 500GB
387GB free
Firmware: AX001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 101
Mixed 103
74% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.21
64% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown N3S04F1333REV.00 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.6
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $288Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $123
Intel Core i5-7600K $200Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $154
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $170SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $200SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback