Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 13:48
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-9590-$110
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.7% Good
SC Int 89.9
SC Float 79.9
SC Mixed 86.8
68% 85.5 Pts
QC Int 341
QC Float 304
QC Mixed 331
74% 325 Pts
MC Int 581
MC Float 499
MC Mixed 574
83% 551 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F9) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 35
Parallax 46.2
15% 44.2 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 39.6
14% 32.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$90
129GB free
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 312
Write 188
Mixed 202
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 13.3
77% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 69.4
DQ Mixed 41.1
46% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 84%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
108GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port
41.3% Average
Read 194
Write 118
Mixed 141
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 13.5
73% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 37.8
48% 85.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
11GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 113
Write 115
Mixed 110
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.32
94% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$35
7GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 62.8
Write 61.8
Mixed 60.8
47% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 44%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$74
2GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 65.1
Write 67.2
Mixed 65.5
50% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.28
105% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 85%
SONY WALKMAN 64GB
55GB free, PID 0b79
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 17.6
Write 7.74
Mixed 11.4
14% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.77
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 1.02
107% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 9905474-060.A00LF 9905474-060.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $815
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $263Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $724SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $56HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback