Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130919
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 13:42
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 102 2-Core 187 75% 127 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 511 54% 431 Pts	64-Core 513 32% 513 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Palit(1569 1184) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.8% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 37.1 Parallax 49.8 33% 42.4 fps	MRender 53.1 Gravity 47.5 Splatting 34.9 36% 45.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 149GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2898 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 967 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 53 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7244640302	59.6% Above average	Read 267 Write 206 Mixed 216 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 22.3 94% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 92.1 92% 149 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2930 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1025 (B1) Unknown 98 98 96 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 52 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 33844762611	97% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 459 Mixed 490 109% 490 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 36.8 124% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 103 108% 179 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 124%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47 20,548 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 328GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 168 2366 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 759 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1997 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 755 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 741 (C2) HDA temperature 107 100 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	94.8% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 159 Mixed 149 120% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 2.49 4K Mixed 0.33 127% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 105%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 215GB free, PID a102 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 98.1 Write 96 Mixed 76.7 114% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.21 66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-415.A00LF 2x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.7 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	387x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	205x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	131x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16