User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAAEON UP-CHT01
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 13:01
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
SC Int 28.1
SC Float 16.8
SC Mixed 21
18% 22 Pts
QC Int 94.2
QC Float 65.3
QC Mixed 80.7
18% 80.1 Pts
MC Int 111
MC Float 65.4
MC Mixed 72.8
13% 83 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 6.4
2% 5.53 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 6.1
3% 5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston M52532 31GB
3GB free
Firmware: 5.1
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 154
Write 15.2
Mixed 29.1
14% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 1.52
29% 9.79 MB/s
DQ Read 11.5
DQ Write 19.2
DQ Mixed 3.08
6% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 22%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
115GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 35
Write 10.1
Mixed 13.1
20% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.76
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.44
57% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HYNIX 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $46Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $268AMD RX 480 $410Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $235Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $137SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $128SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback