Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 12:41
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.55 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 210 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 684 66% 545 Pts	64-Core 857 53% 857 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6583) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 133 Reflection 161 Parallax 147 108% 147 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 138 Splatting 117 102% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164 6,726 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 73GB free Firmware: 5.6.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8595217438 (05) Reallocated sector count 89 89 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 -65000035035219 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 118 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 98 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 35 45 1009320263715 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 99 99 8595217438 (C4) Reallocation count 89 89 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 99 99 8595217438 (CC) Soft ECC correction 99 99 8595217438 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 25769803776 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3575 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2754 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2754 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2573	74.3% Very good	Read 482 Write 257 Mixed 338 79% 359 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 76.8 4K Mixed 16.4 103% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 65.5 88% 162 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 90%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 24942 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 161 (B1) Unknown 89 89 133 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 53 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 120 (F1) Unknown 99 99 41173884459	81.7% Excellent	Read 499 Write 353 Mixed 289 84% 380 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 19.7 113% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 56.6 71% 128 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 151 151 21491286268 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 31 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 80 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 22 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 33 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 33 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 176095297573 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	107% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 188 Mixed 131 126% 168 MB/s	4K Read 1.08 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.25 108% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 66 (03) Spinup time 147 147 21492138234 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 311 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2769 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 25 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 336 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 336 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 180390133796 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	88.9% Excellent	Read 182 Write 128 Mixed 14.2 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.23 100% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.7% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 11.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	82x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	77x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	42x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	41x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	18x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $450

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16