Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 11:34
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 131
2-Core 254
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 693
66% 547 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 20.8
19% 20.4 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
5GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 391
Mixed 416
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 44.6
178% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 110
131% 230 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 112
Write 125
Mixed 115
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.23
92% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 98%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
574GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 131
Write 143
Mixed 129
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.55
4K Mixed 0.44
123% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 75%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
545GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 101
Write 119
Mixed 118
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.25
90% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB-$70
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 19.6
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $701
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback