Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170224
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 11:13
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 105 2-Core 216 72% 131 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 856 76% 644 Pts	64-Core 1,179 73% 1,179 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Asus(1043 046C) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Lighting 68.2 Reflection 61.2 Parallax 83.6 56% 71 fps	MRender 60.7 Gravity 58.1 Splatting 78.1 55% 65.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	270% Outstanding	Read 2,475 Write 1,863 Mixed 1,738 449% 2,025 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 32.5 161% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 32 76% 160 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 270% Great: 354%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 464GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 143 140 3833 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8914 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10846 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5568 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 95 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8818 (C2) HDA temperature 110 86 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	70.6% Very good	Read 131 Write 115 Mixed 114 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.25 87% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 69%
WD WD6402AAEX-00Z3A0 640GB 6,247 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 208GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 175 171 4233 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7266 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12621 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5571 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 109 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7156 (C2) HDA temperature 115 86 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	74.8% Very good	Read 151 Write 109 Mixed 91.1 87% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.32 99% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 40GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 1896608 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3914 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 34691693 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4458 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2166 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 55835426829 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 44 39176175646 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 104 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 13526 (C2) HDA temperature 30 56 -140737488355298 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 120 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 12000138626462 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6851382166 (F2) Unknown 100 253 12782428054	88.5% Excellent	Read 149 Write 160 Mixed 103 102% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.24 89% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 112%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 766 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 88GB free, PID a83a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 137 Write 115 Mixed 118 155% 123 MB/s	4K Read 6.16 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.99 84% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C 2x16GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	83% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 27.8 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 25.2 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 98.4 41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)