Lenovo 4223DC7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 4223DC7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '17 at 13:11
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 144
57% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 459
45% 370 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 332.50
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA72101 1TB
812GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AB0A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 65.4
Mixed 61.9
48% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.16
40% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 47%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
177GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
Read 116
Write 119
Mixed 62.2
123% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.23
58% 0.72 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.9% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback