Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '17 at 21:39
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 95.8
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 150
67% 108 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 462
45% 367 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.3% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 111
Parallax 97.2
82% 103 fps
MRender 88.5
Gravity 92.2
Splatting 98.5
77% 93.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,391
Write 952
Mixed 1,066
252% 1,136 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 38.5
170% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 79.5
87% 150 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 173%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 162
Write 147
Mixed 49.1
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.17
80% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
914GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 139
Write 139
Mixed 29.3
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.2
80% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136
610GB free
Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 92.3
Mixed 80
66% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.44
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
225GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 81.5
Write 68.5
Mixed 70.5
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.46
198% 2.49 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 75%
WD WD1500HLHX-01JJPV0 150GB
84GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 128
Write 111
Mixed 108
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.97
4K Mixed 0.51
147% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 81%
WD WD1500HLHX-01JJPV0 150GB
84GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 138
Write 116
Mixed 111
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 2.97
4K Mixed 0.62
171% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 22.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 15.2
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback