MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7978
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '17 at 04:29
Run Duration334 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 271
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 783
77% 631 Pts
64-Core 784
48% 784 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 51.8
Parallax 55.5
38% 51.3 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 36.8
34% 42.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 402
Mixed 380
96% 434 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 34.4
150% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 112
119% 196 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
233GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 515
Write 349
Mixed 340
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 16.1
116% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 25.1
69% 148 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
231GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 515
Write 352
Mixed 289
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 17.3
116% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 24.3
68% 145 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 118%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
325GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 62.2
Write 56.8
Mixed 59.4
45% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
15GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
6.74% Terrible
Read 24
Write 5.36
Mixed 7.74
12% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.59
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.01
33% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.74%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 26.1
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 23.5
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) Builds (Compare 2,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $589
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback