Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '17 at 21:40
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 79.5 1-Core 61 2-Core 96.3 51% 78.9 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 239 24% 193 Pts	64-Core 252 16% 252 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.4% Below average	Lighting 48.5 Reflection 57.5 Parallax 74.3 40% 60.1 fps	MRender 64.3 Gravity 25.7 Splatting 52.8 39% 47.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000DX001-1NS1 2TB 1.5TB free Firmware: CC41 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.5% Very poor	Read 113 Write 189 Mixed 129 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 5.36 4K Mixed 0.69 5% 2.28 MB/s

Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 433 Write 349 Mixed 392 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 18.8 82% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23.6 DQ Write 72.1 DQ Mixed 17.4 22% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 103%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free Firmware: 9300 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 90.6 Write 77.7 Mixed 57.4 56% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.46 4K Write 5.71 4K Mixed 0.58 231% 2.58 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 65%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0637 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 107 Write 119 Mixed 116 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.27 74% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 67%
SAMSUNG HD105SI 1TB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 239GB free, PID 0475 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 28 Write 26.9 Mixed 26.7 35% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.32 77% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 24%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB 2,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 56GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 46.7 Write 49.4 Mixed 40.5 58% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.21 63% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-447.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	45.5% Average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 17 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 12.6 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16