User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemRazer Razer Blade
MotherboardGigabyte Blade
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120307
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '17 at 18:33
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 88.6
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 131
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 35
8-Core 202
12% 118 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 6744) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2476
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 7.12
Parallax 1.59
2% 3.65 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.43
3% 3.02 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCT-256M3S 2.5 7mm 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VRH1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 498
Write 352
Mixed 401
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 33.8
117% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 66.7
100% 190 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KSN-4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback