Asus H81M-C/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C/BR (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140515
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '17 at 13:52
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4430-$124 24,837 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 174 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 314 42% 317 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 1231) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	2.39% Terrible	Lighting 3.07 Reflection 3.65 Parallax 3.31 2% 3.34 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 3.93 Splatting 1.87 2% 2.74 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.39% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 138GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 73 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896633016 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1452 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 6 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4700 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 761 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 9601 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 9601 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 206159740961 (C4) Reallocation count 72 72 113 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 985	60% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 112 Mixed 141 89% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.16 62% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 103%
Wd2502abys-23b7a0 39M4511 42C0463IBM 250GB 472 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.03B07 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 200 175 983 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2027 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11274 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1581 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 99 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1927 (C2) HDA temperature 108 86 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.4% Below average	Read 82.2 Write 55.2 Mixed 65.4 51% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.35 76% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 64%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38 10,520 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 11GB free Firmware: 3.AEH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 82 73968843 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3732 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 491282301 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 27149 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2178 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 40 522059807 (C2) HDA temperature 31 60 90194313247 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 46 203106550 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	23.3% Poor	Read 40 Write 41.1 Mixed 40.6 31% 40.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.73 4K Mixed 0.24 60% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5401-011.A00LF 2x8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 15.6 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C/BR Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C/BR

CPU
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	55x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	35x
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples	26x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	29x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	28x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	20x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $156

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16