Lenovo 25523Q0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 25523Q0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '17 at 11:22
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 352
43% 328 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 102E) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.04
Parallax 3.16
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.7
5% 5.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 154
Write 143
Mixed 138
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.11
47% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback