| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Dell Precision T5600 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T5600 (all builds) |
| Memory | 56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20170506 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 12 '17 at 00:24 |
| Run Duration | 93 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 58% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.4%
Above average
|
58% 95.1 Pts
|
32% 259 Pts
|
22% 348 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 6950-$290
PwrHis(1787 2307) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
20.2%
Poor
|
20% 24.2 fps
|
21% 24.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
51.9%
Above average
|
58% 269 MB/s
|
61% 18.1 MB/s
|
51% 111 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
67.1%
Good
|
76% 26.4 GB/s
|
23% 8.03 GB/s
|
51% 78.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T5600 Builds (Compare 888 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T5600
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 96x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 82x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 62x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 51x |
| Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 49x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $170 |