Asrock 880GM-LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	3.59% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 880GM-LE (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111103
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '15 at 08:08
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 55.4 2-Core 114 38% 84.8 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 223 30% 222 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Asus(1043 0460) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Lighting 35.8 Reflection 33.7 Parallax 45.8 29% 38.4 fps	MRender 29.7 Gravity 32.9 Splatting 38.5 28% 33.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston SSDNow V Series 64GB 1,215 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: E120506a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9178 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1730 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 38 38 171800723494 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	3.59% Terrible	Read 36 Write 21.9 Mixed 52.8 8% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.52 3% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 52%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 170GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 890 (03) Spinup time 140 135 3958 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4060 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9489 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1599 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 129 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 133 133 201897 (C2) HDA temperature 115 96 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 186 163 1164 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 187 163 1105 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6 (C8) Write error rate 193 161 1496	57.4% Above average	Read 109 Write 91.1 Mixed 25.1 55% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.17 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 79%
WD WD1600AVVS-63L2B0 160GB 2,580 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 41GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 155 153 3216 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8902 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20299 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3952 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 312 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8902 (C2) HDA temperature 111 91 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	25.1% Poor	Read 54.4 Write 33.1 Mixed 17.1 26% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.22 4K Mixed 0.06 14% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 44%
Samsung G3 Station 1TB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 488GB free, PID 6012 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 25.6 Write 24.9 Mixed 25.3 32% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.31 61% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 880GM-LE Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GM-LE

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	3x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	3x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	4x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	3x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	3x

SSD
T253A3512G 512GBTeamBench 79%, 575 samples	3x
E240e 240GBDeva'sBench 52%, 50 samples	2x
XPG SX930 120GBAdata $229Bench 88%, 1,100 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	16x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $275

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock 880GM-LE

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock 880GM-LE

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)