Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '14 at 19:33
Run Duration	868 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 67.4 2-Core 125 44% 96.2 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 335 36% 286 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 51% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 650-Ti 453 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 842B) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.9999 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 17.1 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 19.4 14% 17.6 fps	MRender 22.5 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 15.6 16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 525ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 7463083 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 77498389889038 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 23 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 14 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 39 40 98786869287 (C2) HDA temperature 39 40 98786869287 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7463083 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7463083 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7463083 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 104 (EA) Unknown 0 0 129 (F1) Unknown 0 0 129 (F2) Unknown 0 0 229	38.6% Below average	Read 176 Write 127 Mixed 149 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 6.9 66% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 7.65 37% 81.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 39GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 184721984 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2429 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 55 99255945533 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7572 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1796 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 69 69 31 (BC) Unknown 100 98 12885098575 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 53 606273572 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1419 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7092 (C2) HDA temperature 36 47 64424509476 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 91933774978349 (F1) Unknown 100 253 39176005749 (F2) Unknown 100 253 59313778257	87.5% Excellent	Read 178 Write 127 Mixed 144 112% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 4.66 4K Mixed 0.32 164% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 6GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 43.6 Write 10.1 Mixed 18.3 25% 24 MB/s	4K Read 6.29 4K Write 0.23 4K Mixed 0.05 33% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 28%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 0GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.83% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 1.72 Mixed 1.4 6% 7.24 MB/s	4K Read 3.15 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.003 12% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.83% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	227x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	102x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	27x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)