Lenovo 4384ZM2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 4384ZM2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4384ZM2
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '17 at 19:21
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45% Average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 120
49% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 165
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Legend(17AA 215C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 311.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.54 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.15 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3261GSY 320GB-$75
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MC00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 55.3
Write 64.6
Mixed 59.2
45% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.35
83% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback