PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A88-M (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130501 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 08 '17 at 13:18 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | CHN-User |
Background CPU | 93% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
MSI(1462 2845) 2GB
CLim: 1478 MHz, MLim: 1629 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
10%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
45.7%
Average
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 17x |
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 15x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples | 12x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |