| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150121 |
| Uptime | 5.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 08 '17 at 01:28 |
| Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.2%
Average
|
38% 54.7 Pts
|
14% 115 Pts
|
8% 130 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.4%
Below average
|
31% 45.5 fps
|
33% 41.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
94.6%
Outstanding
|
122% 162 MB/s
|
86% 0.89 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
|
29.3%
Poor
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
16% 5.53 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 289x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 228x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 70x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 51x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |