Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime14.6 Days
Run DateJul 07 '17 at 19:28
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 151
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 451
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Lighting 50.5
Reflection 53.7
Parallax 69
41% 57.7 fps
MRender 53.2
Gravity 48.1
Splatting 38.5
37% 46.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
215GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 315
Write 209
Mixed 109
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 7.24
60% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 30.9
DQ Mixed 8.92
12% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 92%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 394
Write 39.9
Mixed 327
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 18.5
88% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 18.3
21% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 102%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
30GB free
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 303
Write 186
Mixed 234
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 13.1
82% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 12.5
23% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL7-2GBRM F3-12800CL7-2GBRM F3-12800CL7-2GBRM F3-12800CL7-2GBRM 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 11.1
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback