Asrock J3455M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock J3455M  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime18.4 Days
Run DateJul 07 '17 at 18:41
Run Duration374 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron J3455
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
33.8% Below average
SC Int 46.6
SC Float 44.2
SC Mixed 45.6
36% 45.5 Pts
QC Int 183
QC Float 173
QC Mixed 177
40% 177 Pts
MC Int 185
MC Float 175
MC Mixed 180
27% 180 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
ASRock(1849 5A85) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 4.3
1% 4.87 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 8.5
3% 5.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
89GB free
Firmware: 1.3.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 191
Write 104
Mixed 118
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 9.96
68% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 92.5
DQ Mixed 31.5
43% 79 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 51%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$210
2TB free
Firmware: AR13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5980 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 89%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$71
286GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 90.6
Write 77.6
Mixed 76.9
61% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.14
61% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$107
159GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 82.3
Write 77.4
Mixed 55.9
54% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.15
51% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 66%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$71
115GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 98
Mixed 93.9
74% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.21
85% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$107
89GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 113
Write 118
Mixed 107
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.25
94% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$79
82GB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
69% Good
Read 123
Write 117
Mixed 103
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.39
102% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$71
6GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 76.6
Write 101
Mixed 97.2
69% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.17
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 0215 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical J3455M Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock J3455M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $268AMD RX 480 $220Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $235Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $137SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback