bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DX48BT2
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080501
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 07 '17 at 13:54
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 54.6
36% 51.3 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 104
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 92
6% 92 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti (448 Core LE)
EVGA(3842 2068) 1.2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 31.2
21% 31.6 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 27
23% 29 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34% Below average
Read 201
Write 116
Mixed 116
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 9.12
62% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 22.4
DQ Mixed 11.7
12% 19.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 34%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
698GB free
Firmware: 3BKH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 75.8
Write 63.8
Mixed 69.9
53% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.38
91% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
694GB free
Firmware: 3BKH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 74
Write 60.6
Mixed 15.4
36% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.35
74% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
464GB free
Firmware: SD1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 98.3
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.45
119% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%
Apple iPod 80GB
41GB free, PID 1209
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 14.1
Mixed 6.68
15% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.16
18% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.1
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback