HP p6719c

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP p6719c (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AB1
Memory	9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110322
Uptime	10.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '17 at 09:52
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 840T 1,104 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 77.7 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 83.4 45% 68.1 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 165 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 3966) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Lighting 50 Reflection 46.2 Parallax 45.8 41% 47.3 fps	MRender 40 Gravity 43.3 Splatting 38.1 33% 40.5 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2079 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 702 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 175 175 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 84 (C2) HDA temperature 71 49 219044446237 (F1) Unknown 100 100 93404	38.7% Below average	Read 254 Write 155 Mixed 172 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 6.98 60% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 21.2 DQ Write 73.4 DQ Mixed 7.01 17% 33.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 95%
WD WD1600BJKT-75F4T0 160GB 894 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 90GB free Firmware: 11.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 154 149 1300 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1665 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 24967 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1236 (BF) G-sense error rate 67 67 33 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 84 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 1197453 (C2) HDA temperature 114 89 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 73 73 20108 (F1) Unknown 200 200 18066109296 (F2) Unknown 200 200 38262425607 (FE) Unknown 193 193 7	46.4% Average	Read 83.1 Write 78.3 Mixed 75.2 59% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.36 106% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 46%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 70GB free Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 97 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 100 96 (03) Spinup time 124 100 25789727026 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 46518 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 142 100 29 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8719 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 89 89 46423 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 1557581 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 56 454819868 (C0) Power-off retract count 62 62 46524 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 62 62 46524 (C2) HDA temperature 214 136 188979478556 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56% Above average	Read 90.5 Write 105 Mixed 113 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.36 78% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 64C0JKHHJ 64C0JKHHJ Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.7% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.8 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 8.8 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical p6719c Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP p6719c

CPU
Phenom II X4 840TAMDBench 53%, 1,104 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	1x

RAM
99U5471-033.A00LF 99U5471-033.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 27%, 6 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP p6719c

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: HP p6719c

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)