MSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '17 at 17:43
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 702
72% 579 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 34.1
30% 33 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 34.3
Splatting 34.6
29% 35.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z331 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 421
Write 110
Mixed 213
54% 248 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 0.02
47% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 3.9
43% 103 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 70%
WD Gold 1TB (2016)-$50
517GB free
Firmware: RR04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
380GB free
Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 117
Write 124
Mixed 119
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.44
113% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
230GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 39.8
Mixed 38.8
51% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.41
64% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.9% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $385
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback