Lenovo 2429W92

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2429W92  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2429W92
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '17 at 00:03
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 157
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 218
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F6) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.46 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.43
5% 5.46 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05H6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 448
Write 156
Mixed 256
63% 287 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 14.6
68% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 12.5
32% 63.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3160EB68FAW1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback