Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110429
Uptime	16.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '17 at 21:05
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 160 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 376 46% 350 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E155) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2001.0 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Lighting 6.17 Reflection 6.81 Parallax 5.06 5% 6.01 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 4.33 Splatting 5.7 4% 5.25 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4929 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 718 (B1) Unknown 98 98 75 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 46 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 14 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9120658331	59.3% Above average	Read 268 Write 257 Mixed 264 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 27 81% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 76.9 81% 133 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 119%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 480GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 123 105 6841 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2447 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15592 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2050 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 99 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 177 177 71189 (C2) HDA temperature 114 102 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 6 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.8% Above average	Read 99.1 Write 91.9 Mixed 84.8 69% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.14 56% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 59%
Generic USB SD Reader 4GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 6377 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.79% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 5.85 Mixed 8.61 12% 11 MB/s	4K Read 3.84 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 1.08 94% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.79% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 6 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	37.9% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 10.7 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 11.5 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	627x
Core i7 930Intel $249Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	403x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	217x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	148x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	104x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	70x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	342x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	330x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16