Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 156 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 400 45% 354 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 3000M 2,560 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 04A4) 2GB CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	6.39% Terrible	Lighting 7.3 Reflection 8.62 Parallax 6.19 6% 7.37 fps	MRender 9.95 Gravity 7.27 Splatting 9.26 7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.39% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB 9,379 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 30523 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 142 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 72 72 995 (B2) Unknown 94 94 228 (B3) Unknown 94 94 454 (B4) Unknown 94 94 7610 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E8) Unknown 94 94 3804 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25371296711 (F2) Unknown 99 99 11258508689	53% Above average	Read 470 Write 307 Mixed 366 84% 381 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 9.52 49% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 31 DQ Mixed 68.4 39% 37.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 80%
USB DISK 3.0 8GB 610 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 4GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	6.97% Terrible	Read 27.8 Write 7.62 Mixed 8.37 15% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.38 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.01 20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.97% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston X7C75G-HYC Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 X7C75G-HYC Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.5% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.3 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples	237x
Quadro 4000MNvidiaBench 8%, 1,114 samples	91x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	88x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	15x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 45%, 359 samples	15x
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT451S6MFR8C-PB HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 45%, 20 samples	13x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16