Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '17 at 21:36
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 94.5 1-Core 133 2-Core 262 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 627 65% 521 Pts	64-Core 664 41% 664 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 83B9) 1GB CLim: 594 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	5.89% Terrible	Lighting 6.93 Reflection 8.35 Parallax 5.81 6% 7.03 fps	MRender 7.57 Gravity 7.47 Splatting 8.13 6% 7.72 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.89% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 143GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3451 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 539 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 49 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 53 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1623120037	120% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 414 Mixed 422 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 47.6 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 52.2 193% 67.5 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 129 148% 257 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 102GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8644 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1384 (B1) Unknown 98 98 28 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 41 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 68 (F1) Unknown 99 99 26837896421	118% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 409 Mixed 420 99% 447 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 49.2 190% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 108 139% 251 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 134%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB 4,594 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3256 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 400 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 97 97 30 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 4393 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 56 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 199 199 54625 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 36 (EC) Unknown 99 99 14 (ED) Unknown 99 99 30 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0	85.8% Excellent	Read 512 Write 225 Mixed 284 75% 340 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 18.4 136% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 37.5 94% 201 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 91%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 184 180 7775 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1099 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 591 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 227 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 29 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2568 (C2) HDA temperature 104 96 48 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	94.8% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 153 Mixed 141 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.3 109% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 100%
HGST Ultrastar He8 Helium 8TB-$94 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 916GB free Firmware: A4GNT907 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 104 (03) Spinup time 147 147 34389033407 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1167 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3341 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 384 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6580 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6580 (C2) HDA temperature 113 113 257699479605 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68% Good	Read 123 Write 113 Mixed 106 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.69 4K Mixed 0.52 182% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB 8,984 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	61.1% Good	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.7 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 18.4 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 58.6 68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,614x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	441x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	222x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	400x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	227x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	155x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	108x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	105x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16