PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T3600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T3600 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130809 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jun 29 '17 at 19:29 |
Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
60.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
75%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix-00AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,062x |
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 444x |
Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples | 237x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 162x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 137x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 117x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |