| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock 970A-G/3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160112 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 29 '17 at 06:48 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.4%
Very good
|
66% 106 Pts
|
40% 315 Pts
|
22% 361 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.53
|
59.6%
Above average
|
59% 70.8 fps
|
61% 74.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
168%
Outstanding
|
251% 1,132 MB/s
|
151% 49.8 MB/s
|
83% 139 MB/s
|
|
|
44.5%
Average
|
58% 76.9 MB/s
|
94% 1.02 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.9%
Average
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
66% 60.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 112x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $269 |