DELL Studio XPS 435T

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	DELL Studio XPS 435T (all builds)
Motherboard	DELL 0X501H
Memory	10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '17 at 23:33
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 66.8 2-Core 129 60% 96 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 348 38% 300 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770 16,639 User benchmarks, average bench 10% XFX(1682 3150) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.2 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 13 12% 13.1 fps	MRender 10.6 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 12.6 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB 5,703 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS111101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2941 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 955 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 253 (B1) Unknown 0 0 49 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 100 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 16213 (C4) Reallocation count 98 98 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 103 (E7) Temperature 100 100 36 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5 (EA) Unknown 0 0 45 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7375 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17065	53.6% Above average	Read 265 Write 256 Mixed 262 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 26.9 82% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 17.1 DQ Write 48.9 DQ Mixed 13.8 16% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 87%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 235GB free Firmware: 1AA01117 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 5110 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4292 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 11508 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14234 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3359 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 63 370409494 (C2) HDA temperature 75 61 420741145 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 190950 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	58.7% Above average	Read 99.6 Write 105 Mixed 100 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 2.22 4K Mixed 0.47 113% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 16.3 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 435T Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	31x
Core i7 940Intel $79Bench 66%, 2,107 samples	6x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	9x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	13x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	6x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $715

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16